Wednesday, April 29, 2009
unit 4 blog
2)Roberto- Discussion and Planning
Mark- Presenter
Mason-Preparation of the visual product
3) Roberto: recorder- writing everything that we do in our group discussions and distributing the material to the professor
Mark: Presenter- Writing and knowing the material for the presentation to present it on Wednesday.
Mason: Creating the visual element: creation of all the visual aspects of the project.
5) Transportation- Tcu shuttle.
Plus and minus grading system.
Meal Plans.
We decided on using the TCU Shuttle- transportation issue. We believe that this would be a great option for TCU students to transport themselves free of any kind of danger.
6) Our target audience would be the TCU students. The purpose will be to make the TCU shuttle service by adding more routes and providing more options to TCU students. The best visual arguments for this topic would be a mix of visuals, billboards, stickers, t-shirts.
7) The best visual argument would be a billboard advertisement displaying a bus and the possible places that it can take TCU students in downtown or the stockyards. It would be kind of a poster. Another good option would be a billboard on the side of a bus.
8) Roberto’s homework would be to email this document and other future documents to group members and teacher.
Mason’s homework is to brainstorm more ideas for the visual argument.
Mark’s homework is to start preparing the presentation in writing.
2nd group Meeting: April 29, 2009
We are brainstorming on how our billboard and bus advertisement could look like. Also, we are planning our first draft argument for the final presentation. Our argument is that TCU does not provide enough transportation for its students.
Our next meeting will be on Tuesday May 5, 2009. Until then every group member will be working in their parts individually. The meeting’s purpose will be to put all our work together and organize it. We will also be working on the last few things to finish our work and have the presentation ready for Wednesday May 6, 2009.
Monday, April 27, 2009
authors note on portfolio
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
my humorous argument
Monday, April 20, 2009
humor argument
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
humor
Monday, April 13, 2009
oped first draft
Reportedly, Murcia “donated” 6 million to the PRD to help finance the political campaigns of Roberto “bobby Velazquez” and Balbina Herrera. I chose to put the word donated in quotations because for Murcia this was not a donation but an investment in cash that will give him various advantages and contracts with companies that will help his money laundering business more successful. He was also protected by the SPI, which is an Institutional Protection Service in charge of protecting high-ranked people and the president. It is against the law for the people who work for the SPI to provide this service to people not appointed by the president. Therefore this was corruption and proves that money can do anything. Murcia did whatever he wanted whenever he wanted. I have not found information linking the president to David Murcia but I believe that, Martin Torrijos, the president did not manage this whole Murcia situation the way he should have.
As soon as Murcia was caught in November 2008, Martin Torrijos ordered the authorities to send this money launderer back to his country. I think this was a huge mistake because Murcia committed various felonies in Panamanian therefore he should abide by Panamanian law. Our law system is good and it should have taken action over Murcia. Moreover, a lot of things were left unclear after he got caught. For example who worked for him and with him on his company (DMG), who else did he gave money to finance campaigns and did the president knew all along about Murcia? How did he contact the SPI(Protection Service) to work for him. These are just one of the various things that were left unclear and should have been resolved before the president decided to send Murcia to Colombia.
Author’s notes:
This is my first draft for the op ed. I am not sure if I’m I the right track. What I have written so far is kind of an introduction to who Murcia is and what he did. My argument is questioning why Martin Torrijos( Panama’s president) ordered the authorities to send Murcia back to Colombia without resolving various issues that need to be answered. For this draft I will like recommendations on how to address this issue and if im on the right direction.
roberto
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
op ed prewriting
A good issue I can discuss in my op ed is why did panama let go david Murcia so easily. Without making a trial or asking how did he do that and who were the ones involved with him. Supposedly he donated money to a presidential candidates campaign. So, it makes no sense that the Panamanian government did not ask more questions or made him confess who worked with him in the government.
Well the only thing that can be done to address this issue is to go to Colombia to interrogate this money launder lord. This is the only way to get the information the Panamanian governments needs. Or ask the president of Colombia to extradit David Murcia to the united states where he can be trialed and interrogated as it should be.
What will work the most for me to make this op ed a good one good representation of ethos and logos. Good facts about the situation will be key for my oped to be effective and informative about the situation. I will have to make some research on the topic but the article is good enough fo me to respond to it.
Other opeds
Monday, April 6, 2009
op ed
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
editors letter first draft
As a Panamanian, I get offended when I read an article for a major newspaper that lacks info and has grammatical mistakes. The article has valuable facts that inform the reader of a recent and interesting event to the community. But I believe that it was lacking background information. If I were not informed about the issue before reading the article, it would have been difficult if not impossible for me to understand what Santiago Cumbrera wrote on “ La Ruta del Dinero de los Clientes de DMG”. My intention is not to attack Santiago personally, but the article is missing valuable info such as who is David Murcia and what is DMG. Since I am 100 % percent Panamanian, I feel bad about the way this article was written. This is a very serious issue because David Murcia, a Colombian, made lots of middle to high class people lose colossal amounts of money while he was living the good life in my country.
What I liked about the article is that good facts that I did not know beforehand were included. For example, I did not know that Murcia promised their clients a credit card with unlimited credit for spending. Moreover, I did not know that the money first went to national banks then transferred to the U.S and then to Belize. I have to credit that that the article included these good facts that I would have not known without taking the time to read the article. If I was not Panamanian or a person interested in the issue, it would have been imposible to understand these facts without some background info explaining the issue beforehand.
Author’s notes:
This is my first draft for this assignment. I am not sure if I am on the right track. I think I sound like if I was attacking the writer and I am not sure If I am on the right track. Please let me know what you think as of now.
Monday, March 30, 2009
DMG article
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
possible topic for unit 3
Author's notes for final draft.
Monday, March 23, 2009
rhetorical case study progress
Monday, March 9, 2009
Author's notes on rhetorical case study draft 1
Impact on community.
Monday, March 2, 2009
rhetorical case analysis(organization)
How were individuals and organizations affected by Bernard Madoff.
Source 1.
Wilpon’s losses in Fraud Case may affect mets.
- How did he got affected personally.
- How his company will be affected.
- His emotions and reactions to the fraud(pathos)
- Close relationship they had.
Source 2.
Financier’s own fortune led investors to madoff.
- How he got affected personally
- Why he invested
- Relatives affected
- Emotions of relatives
Source 3.
Transitions:
All of my sources talk about the same topic. So, the transitions between topics would be very smooth. I could first start my essay with a small intro of the topic stating the controlling idea. And then introduce my first source and then the second and so on. All of the sources are related so I do not think I will have trouble connecting them.
rhetorical case study
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
concerns
sources:
1) High-tec execs: This can be qualified as a primary source. This is a good source because exposes people who actually got financially hit by bernard madoff's ponzi scheme. I chose this source because it perfectly adresses my topic on how people were affected by B.M.
2) NYU loses 24 million: I feel good about this source because it also qualifies as a primary source. Ichose this source because it directly talks about a university that had accounts with bernard madoff and lost 24 million dollars. Also, it give names of other universities that lost money as well. The ocontext is very interesting because it was very direct and well presented.
3) Dealers among alleged madoff victimes: This is a good source that also exposes people who were affected by this ponzi scheme. I chose this source because it is directly related with my topic since ittalks about madoff and how well known names in the auto retailing industry got financially hurt with this ponzi scheme.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
rhetorical essay sources
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Rhetorical case analysis topic
Monday, February 16, 2009
author's notes on final draft
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Draft revisions
Monday, February 9, 2009
Authors notes
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
observing my space
space to analyze
Spaces in my local community
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Monday, January 12, 2009
About Me
To be honest, I am taking this course because it is a requirement. But now that I am taking it I plan on getting the most out of it. Because I think writing is a really important tool for everyone. Moreover, I will like to improve my writing because I think my writing needs some improvement. Primarily I communicate through text messaging and emails. I'm a very shy person who does not communicate well enough. This is a disadvantage for my writing because it takes me hours to organize my ideas and start writing.
I live in samuelson hall with three friends. The four of us met in high school and we all have strong relationships. I consider them my brothers. I have learned a little from each and one of them.